rustenburg platinum mines ltd v ccma summary

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

New test for reviews in labour court Share page Labour Practitioners have lately found themselves on uneven ground in the wake of the Constitutional Court judgement of Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC)...

Consulter le prix
Life after Sidumo: clarifying the review test

The litigation leading up to the present proceedings had its origins in his dismissal a long time ago On 2 December 1985 the first respondent, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (the Mine), which as its name suggests, is a company principally involved in mining platinum, employed Mr Sidumo as part of its Security Servic...

Consulter le prix
Dismissal: key case to know

Z Sidumo and others vs Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section) and others Case No CCT 85/06 Judgment Date 5 October 2007 Jurisdiction Constitutional Court of South Africa Judges Navsa; Dismissal: key case to know - from CCMA to the Constitutional Court | Skills Portal...

Consulter le prix
Misconduct 1 Sidumo

The litigation leading up to the present proceedings had its origins in his dismissal a long time ago On 2 December 1985 the first respondent, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (the Mine), which as its name suggests, is a company principally involved in mining platinum, employed Mr Sidumo as part of its Security Servic He was a constable until ....

Consulter le prix
SIDUMO v RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES

SIDUMO v RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES Jurisdiction Constitutional Court of South Africa Subject Appeal and Review Issue: The employee, a security guard, was dismissed by the employer for failing to search employees in accordance with the prescribed policy, or not searching them at all The CCMA found that the dismissal was procedurally fair, but that the sanction of dismissal was inappropriate ....

Consulter le prix